Neuroscience
Right? Girls are bad at math, aren't they? Former Harvard president Larry Summers seem to think so...
According to Wikipedia,
So let's do a neuroimaging study (Krendl et al., 2008) with...
How was stereotype threat induced? Why, it's our old friend the IAT (Implicit Association Test)!
Both groups of women started out with the neutral flower/insect IAT2 followed by a set of simple difficult math problems (Time 1). Then the threat/control conditions were followed another set of more difficult math problems (Time 2). The threat manipulation did, indeed, have detrimental effects on performance [but only at p=07], as shown in the figure.
[NOTE: but why did the control group perform significantly better at Time 2, when the problems were much more difficult, than at Time 1?] CORRIGENDUM: practice effects, the problems at Time 1 and Time 2 were both difficult.
What were the fMRI results? In brief, an analysis of brain regions that were more active at Time 2 than at Time 1
Footnotes
1 Why?? you may ask.
Krendl AC, Richeson JA, Kelley WM, Heatherton TF. (2008). The Negative Consequences of Threat: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Women's Underperformance in Math. Psychological Science, 19(2), 168-175. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02063.x
This study used fMRI to identify the neural structures associated with women's underperformance on math tasks. Although women in a control condition recruited neural networks that are associated with mathematical learning (i.e., angular gyrus, left parietal and prefrontal cortex), women who were reminded of gender stereotypes about math ability did not recruit these regions, and instead revealed heightened activation in a neural region associated with social and emotional processing (ventral anterior cingulate cortex).
Links to Math Girl episodes are on the website of Dr. Veselin Jungic in the Department of Mathematics at Simon Fraser University.
- Girls Underperform When They Play Chess Against Boys - Real-life Evidence Of Stereotype Threat?
Judit Polgár, chess grandmasterAn analysis of girls' performances in 12 US school chess tournaments has found they tend to underperform when playing against boys. The researchers Hank Rothgerber and Katie Wolsiefer believe this is the first real-life...
- The Hillary Clinton Effect - How Role Models Work For Some People But Not Others
The benefits, or not, of reading about Ms Clinton Fear of prejudice can adversely affect people's performance. For example, female participants reminded of the stereotype that women are innately inferior at maths compared to men, subsequently...
- Understanding Why Girls Underperform At Science
Like a sand-castle crumbling away in the rising tide, the once-popular idea that there are innate gender differences in science and maths aptitude is being undermined by a succession of new research findings. Earlier this year, for example, Stephen Ceci...
- Gender Stereotypes Can Distort Our Memories
Plenty of research has shown that some stereotypes are not only offensive, they can also have a detrimental effect on people's behaviour. For example, women's maths performance suffers after they are reminded of the stereotype that men are better...
- Emotion & Cognition
Interesting article in last month's Wall Street Journal about emotions & cognitive performance. The free abstract sums it up: "After years of studying situations such as choking under pressure or succumbing to 'stereotype threat' (in which...
Neuroscience
Hey Girl, You're Really Bad at Math!
Right? Girls are bad at math, aren't they? Former Harvard president Larry Summers seem to think so...
According to Wikipedia,
Stereotype threat is the fear that one's behavior will confirm an existing stereotype of a group with which one identifies. This fear may lead to an impairment of performance.[For more info, see Combating Stereotype Threat in the Wild].
. . .
Stereotype threat has also been found to apply to sex differences in mathematical achievement. A common stereotype is that men have stronger abilities in mathematics than women. When women believed sex differences could be revealed by a mathematics test, the men performed better. If the test was presented as gender fair, the sexes performed equally well (Spencer, Steele, & Quinn, 1999).
So let's do a neuroimaging study (Krendl et al., 2008) with...
right-handed female undergraduates at Dartmouth College (N = 28; 14 control subjects) [who] were highly identified with math, as determined by their response to the following question: "It is important to me that I am good at math." A response of 4 or higher on a 7-point Likert scale was required for participation....to see what parts of the brain "light up" during stereotype threat.1 The participants were tricked into thinking the study measured "the neural mechanisms engaged in cognitive tasks that require both speed and accuracy." Half of them experienced a "threatening" condition, the other half a control condition.
How was stereotype threat induced? Why, it's our old friend the IAT (Implicit Association Test)!
In the threat condition, participants were told they were going to complete a task that would assess their "math attitudes" because "research has shown gender differences in math ability and performance." These instructions served as the primary threat induction, as previous research has suggested that reminding women of gender stereotypes in math ability activates stereotype threat (e.g., O'Brien & Crandall, 2003...). However, because this study was the first attempt to induce stereotype threat while participants were in the scanner, the second categorization task we administered in this condition was the math/arts IAT (Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002b), in which participants categorized words as being related to math, arts, males, or females. We intended for this task to further reinforce the salience of gender stereotypes regarding math ability, and indeed, pilot testing revealed that administering this IAT was sufficient to induce the stereotype-threat effect.The non-threatening condition was the
liberal/conservative IAT, which involved categorizing words as being related to liberals, conservatives, unpleasant, or pleasant (Nosek, Banaji, & Greenwald, 2002a). Thus, control participants received no reminder of gender stereotypes regarding math ability.
Both groups of women started out with the neutral flower/insect IAT2 followed by a set of [NOTE: but why did the control group perform significantly better at Time 2, when the problems were much more difficult, than at Time 1?] CORRIGENDUM: practice effects, the problems at Time 1 and Time 2 were both difficult.
What were the fMRI results? In brief, an analysis of brain regions that were more active at Time 2 than at Time 1
...showed that the control participants recruited more left-lateralized activation in the inferior prefrontal cortex (Brodmann's area, BA 47), left inferior parietal cortex (BA 40), and bilateral angular gyrus (BA 39) over time. By contrast, the threatened participants revealed greater activity in the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC; BA 32/10 [NOTE: no one would call BA10 the vACC ]) on the second test than on the first (Fig. 2).What does it all mean? From philidendron:
MC overheard two of her students discussing math class last week.
Girl 1: "Damn girl. I thought you dug math."
Girl 2: "Hell no. Girl? (tongue-click) Hell no. Hell times hell to the hell-powered no! Damn!"
Footnotes
1 Why?? you may ask.
In order to effectively override the stereotype-threat phenomenon, it is vital to understand clearly the core processes that underlie it. In pursuing this goal, researchers may benefit from using neuroimaging to identify brain regions engaged during stereotype threat.2 In the flower/insect IAT,
The categories are presented in congruent blocks (i.e., "flowers" and "pleasant" paired together) and incongruent blocks (i.e., "insects" and "pleasant" paired together). Categories that were paired together were presented on the same side of the screen, and participants were required to use the same response key to categorize stimuli belonging to these categories (e.g., when "flowers" and "pleasant" were paired, participants pressed the same key to categorize the word tulip as a flower and to categorize the word rainbow as pleasant); implicit bias was measured by calculating the difference in response times between the congruent and incongruent blocks.Reference
Krendl AC, Richeson JA, Kelley WM, Heatherton TF. (2008). The Negative Consequences of Threat: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of the Neural Mechanisms Underlying Women's Underperformance in Math. Psychological Science, 19(2), 168-175. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02063.x
This study used fMRI to identify the neural structures associated with women's underperformance on math tasks. Although women in a control condition recruited neural networks that are associated with mathematical learning (i.e., angular gyrus, left parietal and prefrontal cortex), women who were reminded of gender stereotypes about math ability did not recruit these regions, and instead revealed heightened activation in a neural region associated with social and emotional processing (ventral anterior cingulate cortex).Links to Math Girl episodes are on the website of Dr. Veselin Jungic in the Department of Mathematics at Simon Fraser University.
- Girls Underperform When They Play Chess Against Boys - Real-life Evidence Of Stereotype Threat?
Judit Polgár, chess grandmasterAn analysis of girls' performances in 12 US school chess tournaments has found they tend to underperform when playing against boys. The researchers Hank Rothgerber and Katie Wolsiefer believe this is the first real-life...
- The Hillary Clinton Effect - How Role Models Work For Some People But Not Others
The benefits, or not, of reading about Ms Clinton Fear of prejudice can adversely affect people's performance. For example, female participants reminded of the stereotype that women are innately inferior at maths compared to men, subsequently...
- Understanding Why Girls Underperform At Science
Like a sand-castle crumbling away in the rising tide, the once-popular idea that there are innate gender differences in science and maths aptitude is being undermined by a succession of new research findings. Earlier this year, for example, Stephen Ceci...
- Gender Stereotypes Can Distort Our Memories
Plenty of research has shown that some stereotypes are not only offensive, they can also have a detrimental effect on people's behaviour. For example, women's maths performance suffers after they are reminded of the stereotype that men are better...
- Emotion & Cognition
Interesting article in last month's Wall Street Journal about emotions & cognitive performance. The free abstract sums it up: "After years of studying situations such as choking under pressure or succumbing to 'stereotype threat' (in which...