Neuroscience
Medical History: Clinical Trials and Retrolental Fibroplasia
Today's
Washington Post has a full feature story from the annals of medical history:
Establishing Proof Some Fifty Years Ago a Baby-Blinding Epidemic Confounded Experts -- Until a Pioneering Study Conclusively Tied Cause and Effect, and Enshrined Clinical Trials in Medical Practice By David Brown
The Washington PostTuesday, April 19, 2005; Page HE01
[ ... Read the full article ... ] (free registration required)
[snip]
The story of oxygen and blindness is a distant mirror of these therapeutic surprises. But it is much more as well.
Of all the elements on the periodic table, oxygen is the one that seems most to symbolize life and health itself. Could extra oxygen be dangerous to tiny babies struggling to survive? It seemed inconceivable!
But it was true. Two doctors proved it more than a half-century ago in a clinical experiment run in the wards of a hospital in Washington. The medical world didn't believe them, at least not enough to change routine practice. So a second, bigger experiment was conducted at more than a dozen American hospitals.
Fifty years ago this summer, the preliminary results of that trial were published. They changed medical history. Almost overnight, physicians stopped automatically giving supplemental oxygen to preemies, ending the epidemic of retrolental fibroplasia (RLF), as the disease was called then. (It is now known as retinopathy of prematurity.)
But the study's results did something else equally important and historic. They convinced many American physicians of the usefulness of randomized controlled trials, which had been "invented" less than 10 years earlier in Britain. Not least, the study taught doctors they couldn't assume that what seemed like a good idea -- extra oxygen -- would necessarily lead to a good outcome.
"Doctors have to approach their patients, and what they think they know, with a certain amount of humility," said Steven Goodman, a physician at Johns Hopkins University's Bloomberg School of Public Health and editor of the journal Clinical Trials. "This is one of the trials that taught us humility."
[snip]
-
Quality Assurance In Clinical Trials
Public release date: 21-Sep-2008 American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Quality assurance programs improve clinical trials Boston – Quality assurance programs like the one at the Quality Assurance Review Center (QARC) in Worcester,...
-
In The Weeklies: Alzheimer Disease Treatments
The 06 August 2005 issue of the British Medical Journal includes the full-text contents of this paper reviewing the pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer disease:Hanna Kaduszkiewicz, Thomas Zimmermann, Hans-Peter Beck-Bornholdt, & Hendrik van den Bussche....
-
Nerve Growth Factor (ngf) And Alzheimer Disease
Technique Shows Promise Against Alzheimer's By Rick Weiss The Washington Post Monday, April 25, 2005; Page A02 Injections of genetically altered cells into the brain appear to nourish ailing neurons and may slow the cognitive decline in patients...
-
In The Weeklies
Here are some relevant highlights from the new issues of the major medical and scientific weeklies:
Journal of the American Medical Association
15 September 2004
JAMA’s contents this week include the report about dementia and the voter by Karlawish...
-
Disclosure Of Clinical Trials: Ongoing Debate
Today's New York Times provides a report about the ongoing debate concerning clinical-trials findings and the ability to balance favorable against unfavorable findings in an environment where unfavorable findings do not easily come to the fore:
Expected...
Neuroscience