Neuroscience
Bauer, Bond, Salt and their real-life counterparts have ample experience making tough choices between risky options. You'd think this would be a good thing but psychology research shows expertise can backfire when it encourages a short-hand, gist-based approach to problems, rather than a more detail-focused, calculating thinking style. According to researchers at Cornell University, this is what lies behind their demonstration that intelligence officers are more prone to irrationality than students in choosing between risky options.
Valerie Reyna and her colleagues presented 63 undergrads, 54 college-educated adults and 36 intelligence officers (77 per cent were special agents; 7 per cent were officers; and 16 per cent were admin) with dozens of decision-making scenarios related to saving human lives. For example: Imagine the U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two options were then presented and the participants were asked to decide between them as they would in real life. The options were presented in a way that either emphasised lives to be saved:
e.g. Please indicate which option you prefer: a) 200 people saved for sure or (b) 1/3 probability 600 people saved and 2/3 probability no one saved?
Or worded in a way to emphasise lives to be lost:
i.e. Please indicate which option you prefer: a) 400 die for sure or (b) 2/3 probability 600 people die and 1/3 probability no one dies?
The idea is that probable outcomes are matched for options (a) and (b) across the two presentations of the choice, and yet the "framing" of the options affects how people choose. The key finding is that intelligence officers were more swayed by the framing of the problems, and they were also more confident in their choices. The researchers say this is a sign of irrational decision making because the agents were more prone to "treating equivalent outcomes differently based on superficial wording." In short, "they were more willing to take risks with human lives when outcomes were framed as losses rather than as gains."
College educated adults' susceptibility to framing was mid-way between the students' and the agents'. Overall the results are consistent with "developmental reversal" - the finding that children are less prone to framing effects than adults. By this account, intelligence agents are located further along the developmental trajectory than typical adults and so even more prone to framing effects.
"Taken together," Reyna and her colleagues said their results "suggest that meaning and context play a larger role in risky decision-making as experts gain experience, which enhances global performance but also has predictable pitfalls."
_________________________________
Valerie F. Reyna, Christina F. Chick, Jonathan C. Corbin, & Andrew N. Hsia (2013). Developmental Reversals in Risky Decision-Making: Intelligence Agents Show Larger Decision Biases than College Students. Psychological Science (In Press).
Post written by Christian Jarrett (@psych_writer) for the BPS Research Digest.
- We Think More Rationally In A Foreign Language
One of psychology's major contributions has been to document the myriad ways our thinking is sent haywire by a series of biases. Investigations into the ways and means to combat these biases have lagged behind, but that's starting to change. Now...
- How To Give Advice
Information, information, information. That's the message from one of the first studies to look at people's preferences for different forms of advice. Reeshad Dalal and Silvia Bonaccio presented hundreds of students with fictional decision-making...
- How Framing Affects Our Thought Processes
A take-away restaurant near my house offers customers free home delivery or a ten per cent discount if you pick up. It sounds much better than saying you get no discount for picking up and suffer a ten per cent fee for delivery – this is the power of...
- We're Useless At Choosing Between Time-saving Options
From a host preparing for a dinner party to a country constructing a new national stadium, we all tend to underestimate how long things are going to take - an error that's been dubbed the 'planning fallacy'. According to Ola Svenson, contributing...
- How To Promote The Mmr Vaccine
Rather than stressing its benefits, health promotion campaigns for the MMR vaccine should emphasise the protection that is lost by failing to have a child inoculated. That's according to Purva Abhyankar and colleagues who said finding the most effective...
Neuroscience
Intelligence agents more prone to irrational decision making than students
Valerie Reyna and her colleagues presented 63 undergrads, 54 college-educated adults and 36 intelligence officers (77 per cent were special agents; 7 per cent were officers; and 16 per cent were admin) with dozens of decision-making scenarios related to saving human lives. For example: Imagine the U.S. is preparing for the outbreak of an unusual disease, which is expected to kill 600 people. Two options were then presented and the participants were asked to decide between them as they would in real life. The options were presented in a way that either emphasised lives to be saved:
e.g. Please indicate which option you prefer: a) 200 people saved for sure or (b) 1/3 probability 600 people saved and 2/3 probability no one saved?
Or worded in a way to emphasise lives to be lost:
i.e. Please indicate which option you prefer: a) 400 die for sure or (b) 2/3 probability 600 people die and 1/3 probability no one dies?
The idea is that probable outcomes are matched for options (a) and (b) across the two presentations of the choice, and yet the "framing" of the options affects how people choose. The key finding is that intelligence officers were more swayed by the framing of the problems, and they were also more confident in their choices. The researchers say this is a sign of irrational decision making because the agents were more prone to "treating equivalent outcomes differently based on superficial wording." In short, "they were more willing to take risks with human lives when outcomes were framed as losses rather than as gains."
College educated adults' susceptibility to framing was mid-way between the students' and the agents'. Overall the results are consistent with "developmental reversal" - the finding that children are less prone to framing effects than adults. By this account, intelligence agents are located further along the developmental trajectory than typical adults and so even more prone to framing effects.
"Taken together," Reyna and her colleagues said their results "suggest that meaning and context play a larger role in risky decision-making as experts gain experience, which enhances global performance but also has predictable pitfalls."
_________________________________
Valerie F. Reyna, Christina F. Chick, Jonathan C. Corbin, & Andrew N. Hsia (2013). Developmental Reversals in Risky Decision-Making: Intelligence Agents Show Larger Decision Biases than College Students. Psychological Science (In Press).
Post written by Christian Jarrett (@psych_writer) for the BPS Research Digest.
- We Think More Rationally In A Foreign Language
One of psychology's major contributions has been to document the myriad ways our thinking is sent haywire by a series of biases. Investigations into the ways and means to combat these biases have lagged behind, but that's starting to change. Now...
- How To Give Advice
Information, information, information. That's the message from one of the first studies to look at people's preferences for different forms of advice. Reeshad Dalal and Silvia Bonaccio presented hundreds of students with fictional decision-making...
- How Framing Affects Our Thought Processes
A take-away restaurant near my house offers customers free home delivery or a ten per cent discount if you pick up. It sounds much better than saying you get no discount for picking up and suffer a ten per cent fee for delivery – this is the power of...
- We're Useless At Choosing Between Time-saving Options
From a host preparing for a dinner party to a country constructing a new national stadium, we all tend to underestimate how long things are going to take - an error that's been dubbed the 'planning fallacy'. According to Ola Svenson, contributing...
- How To Promote The Mmr Vaccine
Rather than stressing its benefits, health promotion campaigns for the MMR vaccine should emphasise the protection that is lost by failing to have a child inoculated. That's according to Purva Abhyankar and colleagues who said finding the most effective...