Neuroscience
Video games allow players to indulge in simulated behaviours that in the real world would be highly antisocial or unethical, and many people are concerned how this might spill over from the screen to the street. A new study, however, suggests that such activities can elicit a moral response in players, reinforcing the potential of the medium as a means of civic development.
In the study developed by Matthew Grizzard and colleagues, players of a first-person shooter game reported higher levels of guilt when their ten-minute session involved playing as a civilian-slaying terrorist rather than a UN soldier.
Historically, guilt has been a difficult emotion to reach through designed media: an after-school special film can elicit fear or disgust, but guilt involves reflection on your own behaviour rather than that of others. This new finding follows earlier data, cementing a special role for games as a reliable mechanism for producing guilt.
Moreover, Grizzard's study aimed, and succeeded, in targeting certain "moral intuitions" but not others. Specifically, participants playing as terrorists reported that concerns about fairness and care for others were higher in their mind after playing – exactly the concerns that the scenario was designed to violate. Moreover, the salience of these concerns was related to their level of guilt. In contrast, players did not have elevated senses of loyalty, authority, or purity – the remaining intuitions that make up the five evolutionary foundations of our morality. In other words, this game’s guilt gun was carefully calibrated.
Although a control group who reminisced about a real-life time they’d felt guilty, similarly reported higher levels of guilt afterwards, this lacked any correlation with particular moral intuitions, confirming that guilt is not linked to care and fairness concerns by default. This detail is important and invites further research for producing media that can elicit guilt with different moral bases.
Critics of gaming often point to desensitisation as a possible route to moral compromise, so the short time period involved in this game does not directly counter their claims. But it helps us better recognise the complex nature of gaming as a medium. It's quite possible that different stages of playing a game may make one first concerned about violence, then blasé, then extremely concerned once again. And the complicity of play versus passive consumption means different rules for how this form of media may shift how we think, feel... and yes, ultimately act.
_________________________________
Grizzard, M., Tamborini, R., Lewis, R., Wang, L., & Prabhu, S. (2014). Being Bad in a Video Game Can Make Us Morally Sensitive Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17 (8), 499-504 DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0658
Post written by Alex Fradera (@alexfradera) for the BPS Research Digest.
- How Do Horror Video Games Work, And Why Do People Play Them?
Horror video games target evolved defence mechanisms by confronting the player with fright-inducing stimuli such as darkness and hostile entities. By guest blogger Mathias Clasen The video game industry outpaced the movie industry several years ago,...
- Forgive Yourself For Relaxing In Front Of The Tv And The Couch Time Might Actually Do You Some Good
There's a snobbishness about relaxation time. Tell someone your hobby is watching TV and chances are they'll look at you with derision. Mention meditation, reading or yoga and you're far more likely to attract nods of approval. And yet there...
- Effects Of A Violent Video Game Depend On Whether You're Superman Or The Joker
After Aaron Alexis shot dead 12 people at the Navy Yard in Washington DC in September, media outlets were quick to highlight his reported enjoyment of violent video games. To many, this was just the latest example of how violent games can foster real-life...
- It Matters How Much Blood Video Games Have In Them
Hype surrounding the global release of the gangster-themed video game Grand Theft Auto IV has renewed the long-standing debate over whether violent games make players more aggressive. Now Christopher Barlett and colleagues have provided a fresh angle...
- Mirror Neurons & Video Games
Been reading about mirror neurons a lot lately; first in the April issue of Scientific American Mind (abstract only) and now in the New York Times (from June 4, subscription may be required). SciAm suggests that mirror neurons are how we learn from the...
Neuroscience
Could violent video games make players more moral in the real world?
In the study developed by Matthew Grizzard and colleagues, players of a first-person shooter game reported higher levels of guilt when their ten-minute session involved playing as a civilian-slaying terrorist rather than a UN soldier.
Historically, guilt has been a difficult emotion to reach through designed media: an after-school special film can elicit fear or disgust, but guilt involves reflection on your own behaviour rather than that of others. This new finding follows earlier data, cementing a special role for games as a reliable mechanism for producing guilt.
Moreover, Grizzard's study aimed, and succeeded, in targeting certain "moral intuitions" but not others. Specifically, participants playing as terrorists reported that concerns about fairness and care for others were higher in their mind after playing – exactly the concerns that the scenario was designed to violate. Moreover, the salience of these concerns was related to their level of guilt. In contrast, players did not have elevated senses of loyalty, authority, or purity – the remaining intuitions that make up the five evolutionary foundations of our morality. In other words, this game’s guilt gun was carefully calibrated.
Although a control group who reminisced about a real-life time they’d felt guilty, similarly reported higher levels of guilt afterwards, this lacked any correlation with particular moral intuitions, confirming that guilt is not linked to care and fairness concerns by default. This detail is important and invites further research for producing media that can elicit guilt with different moral bases.
Critics of gaming often point to desensitisation as a possible route to moral compromise, so the short time period involved in this game does not directly counter their claims. But it helps us better recognise the complex nature of gaming as a medium. It's quite possible that different stages of playing a game may make one first concerned about violence, then blasé, then extremely concerned once again. And the complicity of play versus passive consumption means different rules for how this form of media may shift how we think, feel... and yes, ultimately act.
_________________________________
Grizzard, M., Tamborini, R., Lewis, R., Wang, L., & Prabhu, S. (2014). Being Bad in a Video Game Can Make Us Morally Sensitive Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17 (8), 499-504 DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2013.0658
Post written by Alex Fradera (@alexfradera) for the BPS Research Digest.
- How Do Horror Video Games Work, And Why Do People Play Them?
Horror video games target evolved defence mechanisms by confronting the player with fright-inducing stimuli such as darkness and hostile entities. By guest blogger Mathias Clasen The video game industry outpaced the movie industry several years ago,...
- Forgive Yourself For Relaxing In Front Of The Tv And The Couch Time Might Actually Do You Some Good
There's a snobbishness about relaxation time. Tell someone your hobby is watching TV and chances are they'll look at you with derision. Mention meditation, reading or yoga and you're far more likely to attract nods of approval. And yet there...
- Effects Of A Violent Video Game Depend On Whether You're Superman Or The Joker
After Aaron Alexis shot dead 12 people at the Navy Yard in Washington DC in September, media outlets were quick to highlight his reported enjoyment of violent video games. To many, this was just the latest example of how violent games can foster real-life...
- It Matters How Much Blood Video Games Have In Them
Hype surrounding the global release of the gangster-themed video game Grand Theft Auto IV has renewed the long-standing debate over whether violent games make players more aggressive. Now Christopher Barlett and colleagues have provided a fresh angle...
- Mirror Neurons & Video Games
Been reading about mirror neurons a lot lately; first in the April issue of Scientific American Mind (abstract only) and now in the New York Times (from June 4, subscription may be required). SciAm suggests that mirror neurons are how we learn from the...